Was Germanwings Flight 9525 Brought Down By Putin? And If So, What Is His Next Move?

Let's remember, that there have been published reports about a theory that Putin was behind the disappearance of flight MH370.

Expert Jeff Wise links Vladimir Putin to MH370 disaster

Wise’s theory is that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the hijacking of the Boeing 777 and landed it in Kazakhstan.

One reason Putin may have wanted to steal the plane would be to hurt the West and its allies, Wise wrote, particularly because the US had imposed punitive sanctions on Russia the day before MH370 disappeared.

And.......
Let's remember that at this same time Putin was annexing The Crimea.
A beautiful "Wag the dog" scenario.

Ukraine Crisis Timeline - BBC

February 2014
27-28 February: Pro-Russian gunmen seize key buildings in the Crimean capital, Simferopol. Unidentified gunmen in combat uniforms appear outside Crimea's main airports.
1 March: Russia's parliament approves President Vladimir Putin's request to use force in Ukraine to protect Russian interests.

 A week later MH370 disappears.

Ya ya.... I know.... kind of a crazy theory, but for me? I would be watching Putin and Russia Very closely.

Russia threatens to aim nuclear missiles at Denmark ships if it joins NATO shield

In an interview in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, the Russian ambassador to Denmark, Mikhail Vanin, said he did not think Danes fully understood the consequences of joining the program.

"If that happens, Danish warships will be targets for Russian nuclear missiles," Vanin told the newspaper.

We Are The 53%

After initially hearing about the occupodos claiming to represent the 99% (people who make less than $343,000) my reaction was "No you are not! You are the 47% who don't pay any taxes!".

So if you go on and do the math, that means the rest of us are the 53%. The people who actually pay taxes.

Apparently there is a burgeoning movement coalescing under the banner of "We Are The 53%". I get it. And in fact I am for whatever storyline is required to unravel the lies of the #OCCUPYWALLSTREET crowd. But let's be frank. The 53% is the Tea Party. It was the Tea Party that got out first to protest the bank bail outs, and to put an end to the Fed. The main difference is that the Tea Party blames the government for the bailouts while the occupodos blame Wall Street and the free market capitalism system that has made America great.

Let me go on to stipulate my own grand conspiracy theory surrounding the #OCCUPYWALLSTREET movement. It is not a grass roots movement inspired by sudden frustration as was the case with the Tea Party. It is part of a vast left wing conspiracy to get President Obama elected to a second term. It is no coincidence that the community-organizer-in-chief reignited the class warfare front with his business bashing rhetoric, and that Warren Buffet declared the rich should be taxed more, and that then college students, unemployed recent grads, and ancient hippies reliving their glory days, suddenly began to occupy ( camp - party - defecate ) public parks close to financial institutions with the support of unions and the ACORN infrastructure.

Everybody now knows, including the Presidents supporters, that the Emperor has no clothes, and so he has brilliantly orchestrated events to rev up his base. Not that his base was going to vote for the other team, but maybe they just weren't going to show up. Even better, maybe the #OCCUPYWALLSTREET astro-turf movement will get his base "to get in the face" of the independants that he will oh so desperately need.

But I could be wrong. Just say'in.

World Ends Tomorrow: So just in case.....

I am going to finish my best bottle of whiskey tonight.

Also, I pledge to get in one more round of golf. I'll need an 11:30 tee time just to be sure to have enough time to finish the round and have a few beers at the club house before 6pm rolls around.

My recommendation for movie viewing tonight is "The Seventh Sign".  You can stream it on NetFlix.

On Sunday, I expect to be replacing that really good bottle of whiskey, and maybe playing another round of golf.

Lara Logan Rape = Tea Party

First of all, I wish Lara Logan all the best and pray for her speedy recovery. I can't even imagine how a political celebration turns into a gang rape that happens out in the open with thousands of witnesses.

But...........Let's see how long it will take for the lame stream media to equate this act to a Tea Party Tax Protest.

Just say'n.

Oh, and let's all wait to hear the islamo-fascist apologists explain how this is really just part of their culture and they shouldn't be judged by western standards. Evidence like this should in no way suggest that their culture is barbaric. No. Really.

Symbolic to Ironic: Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton Agree

It is ironic that Rep Gabriel Giffords read the first Amendment from the well of the House of Representatives in a historic and symbolic reading of the constitution in it's entirety, and that now her purported allies want to pass laws to curtail that very right guaranteed by the Constitution.

Rep Robert Brady has said that he will draft legislation to do just that.

In an interview on CNN, Robert Brady (D-Penn) said he wants to make it a federal crime to use threatening language or symbols against federal officials.

 There are already so many laws providing special protections to members of congress, this particular law would do nothing but provide incumbents a cudgel to any rival that might dare to challenge. After all, what is 'threatening language or symbols'? It's up for interpretation I guess.

---

The Tsunami is Here!

After the last of the primaries was over back in September, the Wall Street Journal wrote an excellent piece beautifully describing the mood of the country and I think accurately predicting the political massacre that will take place tomorrow.

The Tsunami Heads to Shore
The GOP casualties are over. Now the voter uprising is aiming right at the Democrats.

The pros tell us that 2010 will be a "wave" election, and if that's true then think of Republicans as passengers on a ship who have just watched the tsunami roll over them. A few were washed overboard on the port side, but the GOP is likely to suffer no more losses. Now the huge wave is roaring toward shore, heading directly for the Democrats who are running American government.

That they did not see it coming is all the evidence you need to know about how out of touch they are.

The real story of this election year is that the voters are massing to repudiate two years of the most liberal governance in two generations. It is Mr. Obama's agenda that has polarized the electorate and set off this voter backlash. Democratic candidates, incumbents or not, are admitting as much by fleeing from Mr. Obama, his priorities and even their own voting records.

What will the Ideologue-in-Chief do now?

Revoking Citizenship?

Be careful here.

There has been talk, and news pieces regarding the possibility of revoking ones citizenship for involvement in terrorist activities. If you are a naturalized citizen, then sure. After all, your desire to become a citizen was a pretense to allow you to perform an act of war. However. if you were born in this country, and you are the child of parents who are legally residing in this country, then citizenship is a birthright that can never be taken away from you involuntarily.

I don't even know to what end this conversation is headed. The thought that Eric holder is going to take away citizenship and water board a terrorist in order to save lives is ridiculous. This administration has expressed a desire to treat truly qualified enemy combatants as citizens who should be tried in civil courts. Why the talk about removing citizenship? I mean what? They are suddenly going to actually deport someone?

This government welcomes and coddles illegal immigrants. It lavishes the rights of citizens onto enemy combatants. And so, we are supposed to believe that they actually place any value on citizenship? Hell, there is a segment of our population who is convinced that our president isn't a citizen!

Be very careful here. If this government grants itself the right to remove you as a citizen, it won't be in the name of protecting other citizens from foreign enemy combatants. It will be an overt attempt to silence the opposition. If you are one of those terrorists defined by homeland security chief Janet Nepolitano, you know, white male returning home from military duty, or if you own a gun, or if you disagree with obamacare, well then you will have earned your right to loose your citizenship, and need to leave the country.

High Drama Obama

The orchestrated overly dramatic bashing of Goldman Sachs employees is just another example of this administration playing to the lowest common denominator. Nothing to see hear but an over produced advertisement for the next thing on the radical agenda. Unfortunately what is being proposed does not supply any protections. But that does not stop the soap opera and the demagoguery being performed by the ruling party.

Son of Sarbox

Our postpartisan President came out swinging this weekend at Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, claiming in his now familiar ad hominem fashion that the Republican had decided to oppose the Democratic financial reform bill only after meeting with bankers. This takes some nerve from a President whose own bill would expand federal bailout authority

The ironies here and the subterfuge are legion. Which of the big banks on Wall Street oppose the legislation? None that I know of. The mom and pop banks on Main Street do however. the Republican had decided to oppose the Democratic financial reform bill only after meeting with bankers. What does the President have against small town bankers?

• The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau........The bureau would have broad power to set the terms of financial products and services, labeling as abusive whatever officials (or outside allies like Acorn) dislike, and paving the way for large new litigation costs. This bureau would barely touch Wall Street, which doesn't oppose it in any case, but it would slam small banks, car dealers and others that extend credit. The entire point of the bureau is to put politicians in charge of allocating credit.
• Too big to fail. The Dodd bill allows too much discretion to federal regulators to determine which firms to regulate and how, which firms to rescue or close down, and which creditors to reward and how.

Just like health care, this is a take over. Not for direct control, but for absolute control. Only the powerful with the best political connections will be able to survive. Wall Street did not give the majority of their campaign contributions to the democrats for nothing. Goldman Sachs did not give a million dollars to presidential candidate Obama for nothing.

And the show must go on! After the president dashed out onto the stage and came out swinging, the choir that is the senate soon harmonized and chanted the chorus that would reveal the villains to the easily amused.

Senators vs. Goldman

Yesterday's hearing of the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations came in the wake of a Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit accusing Goldman of fraud. The SEC case concerns a 2007 transaction arranged by Goldman in which John Paulson's hedge fund bet that subprime mortgage-backed securities would decline, while institutional investors IKB and ACA bet they would rise.

So the senators are protecting Wall Street fat cats ACA? This does not exactly fit the populist playlist, but hey, it's a show, just sit back and enjoy.

In sum, it appeared to be another bad day for the SEC's specific case against Goldman. But lawmakers seemed intent on finding the firm generally guilty of meeting institutional (emphasis mine) demand for subprime housing risk.

We're not sure which of the politicians at yesterday's Senate hearing did the most to confuse spectators. Investigations subcommittee chairman Carl Levin of Michigan seemed unaware of the difference between a market-maker, whose role is to offer prices at which a client may buy or sell a given asset, and an investment adviser, whose role is to act in the interests of the client as a fiduciary.

Never let facts and reality stand in the way of a good fable. Our modern day Esop's also have motives for their story line.

Noticeably absent were any of these alleged victims who in 2007 were happily chasing yield and hoping to enrich themselves off subprime housing.

You can't make this stuff up! Or can you?

You Can Start Writing That Book.....

"The Rise and Fall of the American Empire"

Today Peggy Noonan Writes
"The heat is on, We May Get Burned"

When I worry aloud about this (mood of the country) and say to a conservative or a liberal, a Republican or a Democrat, that I think something bad is going to happen, no one disagrees. No one says "Don't worry, it's nothing." They say-again, left, right and center: "I'm afraid of that too."

Maybe the end is near? It's not a new theory. In fact 2010 is supposed to be the year.


As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.
In Moscow, Igor Panarin's Forecasts Are All the Rage; America 'Disintegrates' in 2010
DECEMBER 29, 2008

For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously.

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

Well ok. The civil war did not start.......yet. But the inflammatory rhetoric from last week makes one wonder if it is far off.

Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

I guess he got that one right. Spring has sprung and behold, there have been no miracles. The corrupt swamp that is DC has not been drained, the lobbyists have not been banished as promised, and the covenant of a new bipartisan era has been broken.

People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.

I'm not calling him crazy.

You Lie!

Desperate times call for desperate measures I suppose.  In today's weekly address we heard the president spin a pretty picture of his health plan, but he had to play fast and loose with truths to do it.

Now, despite all the progress and improvements we’ve made, Republicans in Congress insist that the only acceptable course on health care is to start over.  But you know what?  The insurance companies aren’t starting over.  I just met with some of them on Thursday and they couldn’t give me a straight answer as to why they keep arbitrarily and massively raising premiums 

That's pretty disingenuous, or at least playing very stupid. Insurers that are losing money get their rate increases approved by state regulators. There is nothing arbitrary about it. And if it's massive, then it's massive because of state requirements that make demands on the insurance company.


The WellPoint Mugging
The brawl over rate increases is a preview of ObamaCare.

WellPoint's California unit, Anthem Blue Cross, recently informed nearly 700,000 individual insurance customers of premium increases of up to 39%. President Obama jumped on the announcement, claiming in a pre-Superbowl TV interview that the hikes were a "portrait of the future if we don't do something now."

Wellpoint's rate hikes are the direct result of the Golden State's insurance regulations—the kind that Democrats want to impose on all 50 states. Under federal Cobra rules, the unemployed are allowed to keep their job-related health benefits for 18 to 36 months. California then goes further and bars Anthem from dropping these customers even after they have exhausted Cobra. California also caps what Anthem can charge these post-Cobra customers.

This explains why Anthem lost $58 million in California on its post-Cobra customers in 2009. If WellPoint didn't raise premiums amid these losses, it would soon be under assault from its shareholders, if not out of business.

Over and over again there are examples of where the types of regulations that Obama wants to impose on everybody are already raising the costs of health care. Not reducing the costs.




In the weekly address he goes on to say

The proposal we’ve put forward would end the worst practices of the insurance industry, lower costs for millions of Americans, and give uninsured individuals and small businesses the same kind of choice of private health insurance that Members of Congress get for themselves

Not really. It will either raise costs, or put insurance companies out of business. He is hoping for out of business, because then the government will have to step in with the single payer plan.

What won’t change when this bill is signed this:  if you like the insurance plan you have now, you can keep it.  If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.  Because nothing should get in the way of the relationship between a family and their doctor.  

Not true either. He already inadvertantly revealed this lie a week ago at the health care summit he held at Blair House.

So much for "If you like your plan............."

on February 25th, the president admitted he lied about being able to keep your plan, if you like it.

Defining ObamaCare Down

One fact is that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that premiums in the individual market would jump by 10% to 13% in 2016 because the government will mandate that consumers buy richer benefits than they otherwise would. Mr. Obama eventually conceded that point but said these mandates are simple consumer protections. "Yes, I am paying 10% to 13% more because instead of buying an apple, I'm getting an orange," Mr. Obama said. "We want competition, we just want some minimum standards."

Whoop there it is........

So to paraphrase "If you like your apple, you'll have to eat this orange". Great. Thanks.

And finally he finishes with:

And so I ask Congress to finish its work.  I ask them to give the American people an up or down vote. 

To which I say yes! Do it! But do it now! Do it Next week! Don't wait until you've paid everyone off. Don't wait until you've threatened or leveraged people to change to votes against their conscience. This is yet another moment of naive bravado. Without more dirty tricks and more Chicago style corruption he does not have the votes, even though the democrats have openly gamed the system.

on reconciliation

It's no slam dunk. And hopefully in the end, this will be resolved and the will of the American people will be served, and my pollyanna view that "cheating cheaters never win" will be maintained.

The Party of 'Doh!'

Just like Disney, every 20 years the democrats take 'Snow White' out of the vault and try to sell it to the American people. To the democrats, 'Snow White' is government run health care. But, to the rest of America government run health care is the wicked witch, and the poison apple.

Like in every scary movie (Is the health-care reform horrorshow just getting started?) there are moments when you think it's safe to peek through the fingers covering your eyes.

That happened today when I surfed to an AP article that was entitled  "Hoyer: Comprehensive health bill may be no go", but within seconds was changed to "Hoyer: Hopeful, not certain, on Obama health plan". Still, it is one of the moments where the producer of the B movie slasher flick tries to make you think everything is going to be OK.

A day after Obama unveiled a sweeping health bill, the comments from the Maryland Democrat amounted to an acknowledgment of reality: in a sour political environment, majority Democrats may not have the votes.

This line from the former disapears in the latter

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said comprehensive reform would be best but it's not all or nothing.

I hope that this really is the last time we try to dress up and put lipstick on this pig, because the country needs to focus on jobs. This recovery is not going to happen until the administration drops universal health care along with cap and tax.  As soon as business knows what the cost per employee and cost per energy unit is going to be they will execute within their budgets. Make those costs too high? Well, then don't expect a lot of growth. Make them reasonable, such that business can compete on the world stage? Then you'll be a hero. Obama can be a hero without even trying.

The Choice is his. Hero or Ideologue?

Lefty Loon Turns Suicide Bomber

After a little surfing it appears that everyone saw this coming. The state-run-media spinning this event into an anti-tea-party tirade.  I posted yesterday:

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)

Not a big free market guy is he? 

However one of my favorite blogs has summed it up best.

Right, Wing-Nut!: Washington Post Ties Austin Bomber to Tea Party

Nice try. The guy hated --

business (GM and others)-- leftist

healthcare industry -- leftist

corporate profits -- leftist

the Catholic Church -- leftist

the rich -- leftist

the American public -- leftist

company management -- leftist

the airlines -- leftist

wealthy bankers -- leftist

GW Bush and his cronies -- leftist

Be afraid. Be very afraid of those Tea Party people. Even though all the violence really comes from the left.

All Patches has to fear, is fear itself!

Don't be surprised if Nancy Pelosi cries more tears of more crocodile fear.

Obama predicts economic disaster in the near future.

Over the weekend in speeches to live crowds and on the web in his weekly address the administration used some statistics in order to advance their health care reform proposals that have devastating economic meaning.

a staggering new report from the Treasury Department indicating that under the status quo around half of all Americans under 65 will lose their health coverage at some point over the next ten years.

Holy crap! Half of the work force is going to loose their jobs! OMFG! Sell your stock! Buy gold! Buy guns! Horde water and rations!

OK, calm down. Let's step back once again and crunch the numbers. Let's see. The estimated age distribution is...
(2009 est.)

• 0-14 years: 20.2% (male 31,639,127/female 30,305,704)
• 15-64 years: 67% (male 102,665,043/female 103,129,321)
• 65 years and over: 12.8% (male 16,901,232/female 22,571,696)

With the US population approximately at 300 million people, that means 200 million are between the ages of 15 and 65. So the president is predicting that 100 million people will lose their health care presumably by loosing their job. Wow! That cannot be a good economic environment.

But wait. He goes on to say that 'of those that loose their insurance, roughly one third will not have insurance for a year or more'. Oh? So those people who lost their jobs and insurance will find a job and get their insurance back from their new employer. How do we know they won't use COBRA to cover their coverage gap? Either way, they get their insurance back through employment and that's good. But that one third who go for more than a year? My God! What happens to them! Do they ever get their insurance back? Don't leave us hanging! I mean that one third turns out to be like.......33.5 million people! Wait? 33.5 million people? That is less than the 50 million who don't have coverage? and if you stagger out the 33.5 million over ten years then the number is roughly 3.3 million people per year who will loose their job for more than a year and become health care challenged, even with the availability of COBRA. So that means we are talking about 1% of the population.

We already crunched the numbers on the 50 million people reportedly without health care.

Obamacare: Crunching the Numbers

Much ado about very little

The upshot of that exercise saw that basically all of the proposed reforms would potentially help about 4% of the population. OK, let's go ahead and add in this new 1% that the administration has dug up with their doom and gloom predictions of the economy. 5%, let's stipulate that these reforms could potentially help 5% of the population. It still begs the question...... Is it worth letting the government take control of 20% of the U.S> GDP in order to help 5% of the population, when 90% of people with insurance are perfectly happy with their insurance?


If medicaid is so great, just put these 12 15 million people on medicaid and leave the rest of us alone!

Ted Undead

What Ted Kennedy Wants - WSJ

Ted Kennedy's death bed request to change the law he sought for is quite possibly the highest form of hypocrisy and abuse of power that I have witnessed in my life.

In 2004 when Senator Kennedy pushed to have the law in Massachusetts changed so that vacated senate seats would no longer be filled by appointment from the Governor, but by special election, it was clearly a politically motivated, self serving tactic. The panic in 'The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts" Democratic party was evident. Senator Kerry had become the Democrats nominee for president and would have to vacate his seat if elected president. The fear that then Governor Romney, a Republican, would have the power to name Senator Kerry's replacement was incomprehensible. And so, with imagery from the knights of camelot, the "liberal lion" rode from Washington to Beacon Hill to slay the dragon that threatened his party's grip on single party rule in the state of Massachusetts.

"Prodded by a personal appeal from Senator Edward M. Kennedy," reported the Boston Globe in 2004, "Democratic legislative leaders have agreed to take up a stalled bill creating a special election process to replace U.S. Senator John F. Kerry if he wins the presidency."

While it was clearly a partisan tactic to preserve the preponderance of power maintained by the Massachusetts democrats, it was principled. Clearly, having a representative to government elected by the people is preferable to one by political appointment. Even people who saw the ruse as nothing but a political ploy had difficulty with serious arguments against making the process more democratic! And so the law was changed.

But Now?

Now that the state has a Democratic Governor, Mr. Kennedy wants to revert to gubernatorial appointments

"I therefore am writing to urge you to work together to amend the law through the normal legislative process to provide for a temporary gubernatorial appointment until the special election occurs," writes the Senator.

I mean WOW! How do you disguise this type of hypocritical naked aggression? What principled argument do you make to justify this reversal of ideals? I have warned in various posts on this blog that we are witnessing a time where Chicago politics is going national. If thuggery and corruption are the tools necessary to get the job done, well then the democrats are just the party to do it. After all, it was Illinios Governor Blagojevich who taught us that a Senate seat "is a f***ing valuable thing, you just don't give it away for nothing".

In all probablity, the Senator will get his dying wish. Where the 'Liberal Lion' can be emboldedned when principle and the good of the people are arguments on his side he won't let those same arguments stop him when they are not.

So who might Obama's good buddy Governor Deval Patrick choose? You know?

x

Senator Caroline Kennedy (D-MA)

Presidente for Life!

Why did Obama not speak in support of an Iranian revolution (until his luke warm words of sadness for protesters was dragged out of him, basically kicking and screaming)? His first inclination was to wait and see how things played out.

Then, in Hondorus, the president is removed from office with the blessing of their Supreme Court, and their Congress, in the name of protecting their Constition. Obama came out immediately and denounced the Hondoran attempts to defend their democracy. You see, the illegal act that the Honduran president was comitting was an illeagal attempt to eliminate the two term limit. Just like their mutual friend Hugo Chavez.

The existence of fake democracy is on the rise. The Russians have lost their short lived democracy. Iran never really had one, but they were able to placate their own people until their clumsy attempt to rig an election. Hugo (Obama's book club buddy) has hijacked the Venezuelan Government.

Don't think for a second that it can't happen here! If legalizing the largely Latino undocumented voter community, and the ACORN enabled voter fraud successfully gets Obama a second term, you can be sure he will go for a third term. That's why the armed defense of democracy sends a chill down his back, and the idea of mass protests over election fraud is something he is very cool on.

Gangsta Land: ObamaCorps

The Wall Street Journal and Fox News are reporting that the Federal Inspector General for the agency that oversees government subsidized volunteer programs such as AmeriCorps, and oh say ACORN, has been fired by the White House. The reason? Good old Chicago style cronyism is the issue on the surface. You see, This Inspector General, Mr Gerald Walpin, had blown the whistle on a non-profit organization that was embezzling taxpayer money. That's his job after all. Well, unfortunately for Mr Walpin, the non-profit receiving the federal funds happened to be NBA star and Obama supporter Kevin Johnson. Because Mr Walpin refused to drop his recomendation for banning Mr Johnson from recieving federal funds, he has been fired.

What's the big deal? Favoritism, spoils of war, politics as usual right? This is a huge deal! This is not a superficial case for abuse of power. I mean forget the fact that Obama has been promising the american people that there would be complete transparency in the way stimulus funds would be spent. Forget the fact that Obama co-sponsored the Inspector General Reform Act, making the firing of Mr. Walpin illegal. This is about elections! This is about greasing the rails and paving the way for the smooth flow of fedral money to ACORN. The brown shirts, er um, I mean orange shirts will play an ever increasing role in elections and politics. It was recently reported (saw it on Atlas Shrugged first) that ACORN recently got involved with the antics taking place in the New York State Senate. Participating in a protest, ACORN and gang knocked down a Republican State Senator and spit in the face of his aid.

If heir presidente gets to move on his ideas for mandatory national service, the ranks of ACORN will swell with the young impresionable minds of your children. The Obama Youth is born! (visualize the end of the star wars movie where the camera pans out revealing the massive clone army forming up and being loaded onto the Empires star cruisers)

Forget Socialism; Totalitarianism is the name of this game!

Today The Commander in Hope announced his plans for a Cyber Czar. My first thought was "what? Why another layer of bureaucracy? Why is this persons organization going to be better than the FBI or the NSA? Won't this just cause more turf wars and infighting? Will the position be granted broad powers by congress? How is this gonna work?"

But then I got it. Who ever gets appointed to this position will have a very aggressive to do list before even pretending to fight off Chinese hackers.

Action items as of day 1:

1. Make sure all of the tracks that could lead to the discovery of the illegal internet fund raising by the Obama campaign can never be discovered.
2. Make sure that the GOP or any other group can't use anonymous micro-transactions over the internet from super rich donators (like George Soros) for fund raising, like the Obama campaign did.
3. Roll out internet voting in time for the 2012 election.

I don't care who you are; that's a lot of work to get done in 4 years.

James Carville has been hawking his new book "40 More Years" on all the networks and news cable shows. He's being coy. He knows that if everything goes according to plan that we are looking down the precipice of one party rule, a.k.a totalitarianism, forever!

Two issues we will be hearing about more of in the future can make this a certainty. Only one of the initiatives needs to be successful.

1. Internet voting
2. Immigration reform

By 2012, the Reagan Democrats, and the Angry at Bush Conservatives will be sick of hope-and-change-anomics. But it could be too late. The middle of America swing voters won't be able to make up for the government dependent wave of new amnesty voters or the number of votes that can litterally be "programmed" into the election via internet voting.

If both of these issues are not completely put down, then Carville is right; The Republic is Dead!

---

---

He's wrong in his reasoning of why. He forgets that the poor, young, idealistic students grow up, get jobs, and ultimately think differently about having their money separated from them with such carelessness.

It's Happening.............

Atlas is about to shrug.

Right, Wing-Nut!: Geithner, Starring as "Atlas Shrugged" Villain Wesley Mouch

Right before your very eyes!

It's him! Wesley Mouch! Totally!

Mr. Thompson must be very proud!